干细胞之家 - 中国干细胞行业门户第一站

 

 

搜索
朗日生物

免疫细胞治疗专区

欢迎关注干细胞微信公众号

  
查看: 220191|回复: 82
go

肿瘤自身能生成血管吗?   [复制链接]

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
13511 
威望
13511  
包包
32034  

论坛元老 优秀版主 专家 金话筒 精华勋章 优秀会员

楼主
发表于 2010-11-24 20:54 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印
本帖最后由 marrowstem 于 2010-11-24 21:29 编辑
/ U1 B7 h; ]; s( a
- r4 T1 D& l9 d6 ?( x; s6 }9 J      
3 g1 e6 C4 H; H, y' v     一直以来认为,肿瘤自身是不能形成血管的,肿瘤组织内部的血管通过肿瘤细胞分泌高浓度的血管生长因子来诱导瘤组织周围的血管生长进入肿瘤内部,此可给内部的肿瘤细胞增殖提供营养和养分,使肿瘤体积进一步增大。
; |$ F1 n# D" D* ]0 H5 x      40年前,哈佛大学医学院的细胞生物学家Folkman就提出,肿瘤的增生依赖周围的血管,阻断肿瘤的血供就能治愈肿瘤。后来有人依据此理论开发出能阻止血管生成的抑制剂,如Avastin(阿伐斯汀),虽然在临床上有效,但进一步的统计提示只能延长肿瘤患者几个月的生命。
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册
已有 1 人评分威望 包包 收起 理由
细胞海洋 + 30 + 50 原创内容

总评分: 威望 + 30  包包 + 50   查看全部评分

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
13511 
威望
13511  
包包
32034  

论坛元老 优秀版主 专家 金话筒 精华勋章 优秀会员

沙发
发表于 2010-11-24 21:07 |只看该作者
但最近在《自然》杂志发表大两项研究结果表明,癌细胞直接就能生成血管。证明肿瘤不只是依赖它所寄生的血管来获取营养,他们能形成自己的脉管系统。在这两项研究中,研究人员使用了患有胶质母细胞瘤的这种高度恶性脑癌患者的肿瘤样本,他们发现肿瘤内部的许多血管细胞包含癌细胞的遗传标记特征,此表明血管源自肿瘤本身。: p1 F9 i/ H, R9 E& r% l; y( }  c
      研究人员随后利用这些标记确定了具有干细胞特性的肿瘤细胞亚群,也就是说,他们能够发展成为具有不同功能的细胞。在培养皿内,这些细胞可以形成血管,研究人员据此得出结论:肿瘤干细胞既能形成肿瘤,也能形成血管。

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
13511 
威望
13511  
包包
32034  

论坛元老 优秀版主 专家 金话筒 精华勋章 优秀会员

藤椅
发表于 2010-11-24 21:22 |只看该作者
另外这一发现也很好的解释了为什么一些原被寄予厚望、认为会给癌症治疗带来革命性效果的肿瘤治疗靶向药物(血管生成抑制剂)没有展现出预期的效果来。
! ?3 ^: g. D( W% `$ V4 p7 x3 R    UCSF(加州大学旧金山分校)的癌症生物学家针对这两项研究分析认为,阿伐斯汀和其它类似药物也许针对的路径在这些肿瘤制造的血管中并不存在,而面对肿瘤血管,单一路径可能是行不通的。: d% f0 W0 `/ z( _3 c: a( ?, y! ^6 x
     这就是问题的答案,因为肿瘤细胞能自身生成血管,要想有效地治疗肿瘤,必须开发出能针对抑制肿瘤自身血管生成的肿瘤靶向药物才是真正的个体化治疗之道。

Rank: 2

积分
234 
威望
234  
包包
742  

优秀会员

板凳
发表于 2010-11-24 21:37 |只看该作者
干细胞之家微信公众号
很有趣哈,肿瘤中存在的肿瘤干细胞能分化成血管。楼主能否把原文告诉一下呢?

Rank: 2

积分
234 
威望
234  
包包
742  

优秀会员

报纸
发表于 2010-11-24 21:37 |只看该作者
很有趣哈,肿瘤中存在的肿瘤干细胞能分化成血管。楼主能否把原文告诉一下呢?

Rank: 2

积分
158 
威望
158  
包包
510  
地板
发表于 2010-11-25 09:04 |只看该作者
附原文:
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册
已有 2 人评分威望 包包 收起 理由
marrowstem + 5 + 10 感谢支持
细胞海洋 + 2 + 5 极好资料

总评分: 威望 + 7  包包 + 15   查看全部评分

Rank: 2

积分
158 
威望
158  
包包
510  
7
发表于 2010-11-25 09:05 |只看该作者
Tumours grow their own blood vessels, o& W7 D& \. e: w* x
Finding explains failure of drugs that target host vasculature.
8 y: |- E- T, A! f: _0 ^0 Q* j% E# f9 i2 d( J# ]
Alla Katsnelson
+ }' I: {! U6 ]0 ?. o" s
6 L# [; t8 e8 e, J: ?) I9 e. P2 B. {; Y; _
For some tumours at least, a lack of host blood supply is not a problem.
- }- }: a! ]9 pCLOUDS HILL IMAGING LTD / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARYTumours don't just rely on their host's blood vessels for nourishment — they can make their own vasculature, according to two independent studies from the United States and Italy. The findings offer an explanation for why a class of drug once heralded as a game-changer in cancer treatment is proving less effective than had been hoped. + O6 [8 P" A3 H5 @

: v" Y. N2 w  U1 bAlmost four decades ago, Judah Folkman, a cell biologist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, proposed that tumours were dependent on the blood vessels surrounding them, and that choking off that blood supply would kill the cancer1. Bevacizumab (Avastin), the first drug to block blood-vessel growth, was approved in 2004, but it and other 'angiogenesis inhibitors' have proved disappointing in the clinic, extending patients' lives for at best a few months. 7 U  V0 T3 q1 l2 `& I" w9 t
- A  ]8 a) t2 @/ w- t; O: ^& s) q
Now two studies published online today in Nature2,3 have identified blood vessels grown directly from cancer cells. So Avastin and drugs like it may be targeting a pathway that is not present in those tumour-made vessels, says David Cheresh, a cancer biologist at the University of California, San Diego, who was not involved in either study.
5 p; }5 `3 y* Z3 O8 d0 S  K
1 @1 o5 C( W8 uWhen it comes to treatment, "most people agree that a single pathway is not going to do it," he says. % l* `$ a% R' Z

3 ^4 H1 N1 Z4 j/ B; f! P( V0 ?* ]Telltale markers
# T$ v1 p0 a3 R0 X: B- g& M# q+ tIn both studies, researchers worked with tumour samples from patients with an aggressive type of brain cancer called glioblastoma. They found that many of the blood-vessel cells within the tumours contained genetic markers characteristic of the cancer cells, suggesting that the blood vessels were of tumour origin.
2 t8 V( G% v9 K' v9 d; ^6 O
! M5 q( x3 Y$ _The researchers then used markers to identify a subset of tumour cells known to have stem-cell-like properties — that is, the ability to develop into cells with different functions. In a dish, these cells could make blood vessels and, when they were injected into the brains of mice, tumours developed with blood vessels that clearly came from the original human cells. Those stem-like cells, the researchers concluded, could form both tumour and blood vessel.4 A. Z" r& z" y2 ~5 R
- O) `2 V) q, x( m  X$ c3 R
Such cells seemed to be first making blood-vessel precursor cells, and then differentiating into blood-vessel cells. One of the groups, led by Viviane Tabar, a neurosurgeon and stem-cell researcher at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, applied Avastin to cells in a dish to try to block these events. Although the drug did affect differentiation into blood-vessel cells, "we found that Avastin does not alter that first process whatsoever," says Tabar.! s0 g# W8 _- E# c( O1 B' j6 ]  O

  O" n" F7 J! [; T( u3 K! jIn the second study, Ruggero De Maria from the Italian National Institute of Health in Rome and his colleagues selectively killed the tumour-related blood-vessel cells. This caused the tumours to shrink, showing their reliance on those blood vessels. However, the number of tumour-derived blood-vessel cells in each tumour sample varied from 20% to 90%, suggesting that blood-vessel formation was more important for some tumour cells than others.9 J, }4 O* p2 o# u+ {

* R% s- S4 s6 l9 `+ W2 B, [Tabar says that it is not clear whether this self-vascularizing capacity is widely present in other tumour types, although there are some hints that this is the case. "It would be very exciting if other tumour cells exhibit the same phenomenon," she says.
$ r5 A) y' l2 D* s$ v" `, W( T4 [6 R/ O: `
Two-pronged attack
" P! G. d$ [! i9 H( nThis isn't the first time researchers have suggested that cancer cells can make their own blood vessels. In 1999, Mary Hendrix, a cancer researcher now at Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois, and her colleagues reported a similar effect in melanoma cells which they called "vascular mimicry"4.6 d+ O: p0 s9 ?- S- x# Q, d. q! l

& b5 v! l( k+ ^0 Q# d4 FAt the time, says Hendrix, her group predicted that these vascular cells would prevent drugs such as Avastin from being fully effective, but their findings were controversial. The two latest studies support the idea's validity, she says, as well as demonstrating "an example of the functional plasticity of tumour cells".% @( m# L& t$ u; Z. q5 |) K
0 y4 Y; U1 c/ u* k
ADVERTISEMENT1 p7 s/ n; U7 }, N3 g

3 l* k* u" ?6 }# d) l 8 d  h9 J& q6 ^! L( H
Such plasticity means that researchers must look for a combination therapy that can target both the host vasculature, as Avastin does, and the stem-like cancer cells that can create both vasculature and tumour tissue, Hendrix adds.
0 w& D/ r) V+ r3 ^" N% g# a! Y' Y& X; K: H3 o
Cheresh agrees. Today's findings in glioblastoma are not the only recent strike against anti-angiogenesis drugs. In the last two years, a handful of studies have reported that, counterintuitively, such drugs can speed tumour growth (see Cutting off cancer's supply lines, 2009)5,6,7,8. But that doesn't mean that the strategy of targeting the blood supply is inherently faulty, says Cheresh, who co-authored two such studies.
+ n1 \4 o6 t* ]8 o
9 ^$ d5 Y8 ^5 u) l2 H"There are many more ways to affect the vasculature" than through such drugs, he notes: "It means we need to identify either more than one drug" to shut down blood vessels of tumour and non-tumour origin, "or a common molecular mechanism affecting both the tumour and the vasculature".
1 v4 }+ A& C  I; v8 c, g- Z  i5 p! D. W# [/ x6 ?: J
References
* ~2 V! D% `) }7 _) M6 A2 m1.Folkman, J. N. Engl. J. Med. 285, 1182-1186 (1971).
3 W1 A3 l' e* `1 c! |/ B2.Wang, R. et al. Nature advance online publication doi:10.1038/nature09624 (2010).
! Z. b4 }2 M4 _# d' x$ {3.Ricci-Vitiani, L. et al. Nature advance online publication doi:10.1038/nature09557 (2010).
$ @" _( A5 J! S. x( s. b. j4.Maniotis, E. J.[/author] et al. Am J. Pathol 155, 739-752 1999.5 w/ o4 a% A* }0 `# [% U
5.Pàez-Ribes, M. et al. Cancer Cell 15, 220-231 (2009).; \$ Y3 f" p$ r) b  Q: z: C8 q1 B9 A
6.Ebos, J. M. L. et al. Cancer Cell 15, 232-239 (2009).
" R* Q) ~+ P+ K& v7.Greenberg, J. I. et al. Nature 456, 809-813 (2008).( P) x$ Z0 |9 M# {, m
8.Stockmann, C. et al. Nature 456, 814-818 (2008).

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
496 
威望
496  
包包
1265  

优秀会员 金话筒 新闻小组成员

8
发表于 2010-11-30 13:59 |只看该作者
对这块不太懂,有谁说说肿瘤血管 的成分吗?我百度里没有查到

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
496 
威望
496  
包包
1265  

优秀会员 金话筒 新闻小组成员

9
发表于 2010-11-30 14:40 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 qingshui1985 于 2010-11-30 14:48 编辑 * t" l2 m3 H8 A4 }( g7 @
" @: _8 B$ U/ R+ ^
回复 marrowstem 的帖子7 F. W, ^3 j$ |0 F5 h

# V: R4 z' c* A百度百科里提及毛细血管的组成:“毛细血管的口径小,数量最多,总的横截面积最大,血流速度最慢,管壁最薄,仅由单层内皮细胞和基膜组成,通透性很好,有利于血液与组织进行物质交换,故毛细血管被称为交换血管”/ J6 n2 {6 }5 i+ ~" N8 R9 j
=---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 o# a( X! `& @
一般认为肿瘤可以随着血管和血液扩散。而这次报道肿瘤能够自己生产血管,要抑制它更难了。  J# }( M5 d2 _% K/ y& K& ?
我同意您的观点,我也认为在抑制肿瘤扩散依靠阻断血管内皮生长因子VEGF来抑制内皮细胞的形成,进而抑制肿瘤可能是不行的。; p/ R8 F  V) O$ j  S: K
! y, |0 n+ [4 b" t, D- H1 x3 j
一来,如现在报道的,肿瘤能产生血管,产生内皮细胞。抑制内皮对肿瘤本身的效果大大降低。6 j- y1 }7 E# H2 z
二来,内皮细胞通透性强不具备阻碍肿瘤细胞迁移的能力。
8 H$ }9 D, ^- @
( I9 w" d6 b4 B1 N6 R我更倾向于关于于从抑制肿瘤血管的基膜下手。同样有两方面的原因:3 q" |3 w- d) m6 K0 R# o% N
一来,基膜是选择性渗透能力的非细胞结构。比起内皮细胞,血管基膜对肿瘤迁移可能有一定的阻挡作用。
$ g4 a5 J1 A% [1 p二来,肿瘤又往往与衰老相关。而人的衰老,反应在细胞水平则不是明显,因为人有干细胞不断更新,如血液干细胞等。但是人的体内的非细胞的基质成分代谢则比较弱。如随着人的衰老,人的可溶性胶原会流失,而使得皮肤皱着失去弹性。因而从这一点看来,衰老导致的非细胞基质的损失要比细胞损失大的多。反应在血管上,非细胞基质的流失可能就容易血管基膜老化,渗透性可能发生改变。最终,可能让肿瘤细胞乘虚而入。因而,我觉得从提高血管基膜的的胶原I和III 入手可能会更好一些。如,可以适当下调金属蛋白酶的活性MMP,上调组织金属蛋白酶抑制剂(TIMPs)活性。
; I2 X8 E; g$ R5 k/ [* c' j这样即便不能治疗肿瘤,消除肿瘤,但也有希望抑制肿瘤沿着血管和血液的扩散。
已有 1 人评分威望 包包 收起 理由
marrowstem + 10 + 10 欢迎参与讨论

总评分: 威望 + 10  包包 + 10   查看全部评分

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
13286 
威望
13286  
包包
34831  

论坛元老 精华勋章 金话筒 专家 优秀会员 优秀版主

10
发表于 2010-11-30 15:44 |只看该作者
原文没看太明白,新生血管来源于肿瘤样本就一定是所谓的“肿瘤干细胞”产生的吗?说不定肿瘤样本中“共生”干细胞变成了内皮细胞呢
已有 1 人评分威望 包包 收起 理由
细胞海洋 + 2 + 5 欢迎参与讨论

总评分: 威望 + 2  包包 + 5   查看全部评分

‹ 上一主题|下一主题
你需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册
验证问答 换一个

Archiver|干细胞之家 ( 吉ICP备2021004615号-3 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-3 23:03

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.