Inhibition of ROMK potassium channel by syntaxin 1A - 《American Journal of Physiology》美国生理学杂志干细胞之家



免疫细胞治疗专区	欢迎关注干细胞微信公众号

12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 24 下一页

返回列表

查看: 476575\|回复: 235	go Inhibition of ROMK potassium channel by syntaxin 1A [复制链接]

轻羽

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分: 0
威望: 0
包包: 0

楼主

发表于 2009-4-21 13:06 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas' p/ I! `7 a$ C6 n4 Z( \( x

ABSTRACT# |  Z" y' k7 d( y$ _
7 [% k( w* S+ N  Z
ROMK potassium channels are present in the cortical collecting duct (CCD) of the kidney and serve as apical exit pathways for K  secretion in this nephron segment. K  secretion in the CCD is regulated by multiple factors. In this study, we show that syntaxin 1A, but not syntaxin 3 or 4, inhibited whole cell ROMK currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Syntaxin 1A, but not syntaxin 3 or 4, interacted with the COOH-terminal cytoplasmic domain of ROMK in intro. Coexpression with synaptobrevin 2 reversed inhibition of whole cell ROMK currents by syntaxin 1A. In excised inside-out membranes of oocytes, application of fusion proteins containing the cytoplasmic region of syntaxin 1A to the cytoplasmic face caused a dose-dependent inhibition of ROMK. We further examined regulation of the K  channels in the CCD by syntaxin 1A. Application of botulinum toxin C1 to the excised inside-out membranes of the CCD caused an increase in the activity of K  channels. In contrast, application of toxin B had no effects. These results suggest that syntaxin 1A causes a tonic inhibition of the K  channels in the apical membrane of the CCD. Binding of synaptobrevin 2 to syntaxin 1A during docking and fusion of transport vesicles to the plasma membranes of CCD may lead to activation of these channels.7 e- m& L8 u$ Z- }7 `( j6 W9 u
1 W$ h2 z$ c" C, c
inward rectifier potassium channels; botulinum toxin; soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor proteins
' U- `' \% q2 S* c
THE LOW-CONDUCTANCE K  CHANNELS play important roles in K  secretion in the cortical collecting duct (CCD) and K  recycling in the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop (9). Secretion of K  in the CCD is mediated by active transport of K  into the cell through the basolateral Na -K -ATPase followed by passive movement of K  into the tubular fluid through the apical low-conductance K  channels.

cDNAs for renal K  channels ROMK1 and its isoforms ROMK2 and ROMK3 have been isolated (11, 12). ROMK1 encodes a polypeptide of 391 amino acids. ROMK2 polypeptide lacks the first 19 amino acids of ROMK1 but is otherwise identical to ROMK1. ROMK3 polypeptide has a unique sequence for the first 19 amino acids in the NH2 terminus. The remaining amino acids 20–399 for ROMK3 are identical to amino acids 13–391 of ROMK1. The distribution for the three ROMK isoforms varies and overlaps among tubular segments, ranging from the outer medullary thick ascending limb to inner medullary collecting ducts. Based on the distribution of mRNA and proteins, and biophysical characterization, it is believed that the low-conductance K  channels in the apical membranes of principal cells of CCD are made up of heteromultimers of ROMK1 and ROMK2 (11).# ^& G* M4 H0 w( g

As the final common pathway for K  secretion in the CCD, ROMK is a target for regulation by multiple factors. These factors include peptide hormones such as vasopressin and bradykinin, intracellular pH, and changes in dietary K  intake (9, 11, 13). Some of the factors (such as intracellular pH) regulate opening probability of the channel (6). Others (such as changes in dietary K  intake) regulate the density of active channels (27). An increase in the density of active channels may be caused by an increase in channel expression, insertion of channels from an intracellular pool, and/or activation of preexisting silent channels.

Docking and fusion between transport vesicles and target acceptor membranes (such as fusion of the transport vesicles with plasma membranes in biosynthetic trafficking) involve the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins (31). Every transport vesicle contains on its surface proteins that specify that vesicle's target (v-SNAREs). Target membranes possess cognate partners (t-SNAREs) that interact with the v-SNAREs. The specific interaction between v-SNAREs and their cognate t-SNAREs ensures delivery of transport vesicles to their distinct and specific targets (31).2 g$ ]3 b+ t8 z
) \* f9 ]% s7 L. M+ n7 j: a
v-SNAREs include synaptobrevins, synaptotagmins, and synaptophysins. t-SNAREs include syntaxins and synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25) (31). Each of the SNAREs belong to a large gene family. For example, in mammalian cells at least 13 different syntaxins, 8 different synaptobrevins, and 3 SNAP-25 homologs have been identified (2, 4, 7, 28). Two factors may contribute to the multiplicity of isoforms for SNAREs. First, multiple isoforms of SNAREs are needed to allow specific targeting to distinct intracellular loci throughout the cell (28). For example, syntaxin 1, 2, 3, and 4 are present in the plasma membranes and involved in vesicle trafficking to this destination (2, 4). In contrast, syntaxin 5 is present in the Golgi complex and plays an important role in membrane trafficking between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi (2, 7). Syntaxin 6, 7, and 8 are involved in endosomal trafficking (28). The other contributing factor for the multiplicity of SNAREs is the heterogeneity of SNAREs in different tissues. In the kidney, syntaxin 4 and 3 and synaptobrevin 2 have been localized to the apical membrane, basolateral membrane, and intracellular vesicles of collecting ducts, respectively, suggesting that they have roles in docking and fusion of vesicles in this nephron segment (15, 19, 20, 25).; _- K' d3 T$ u0 q, l
9 q/ X$ F% [: P2 y: m* L5 H6 x
Besides the role in vesicle docking and fusion, SNARE proteins also play important roles in directly regulating the function of the proteins in the target membranes. Syntaxin 1A, the neuronal t-SNARE, inhibits the activity of voltage-gated Ca2  channels via direct protein-protein interaction (3, 30, 33, 37). The potential role of syntaxin 1A in the kidney has not been fully explored. Although initially thought to be exclusively in neurons, syntaxin 1A has recently been found in other tissues, including colonic and airway epithelial cells as well as in the kidney (1, 16, 22–24). Similar to its regulation of voltage-gated Ca2  channels at neuronal synapses, syntaxin 1A directly regulates the function of the CFTR Cl– channel in colonic and airway epithelial cells and the epithelial Na  channel (ENaC) in renal epithelial cells through protein-protein interaction (23, 24, 29). In this study, we report that syntaxin 1A inhibits ROMK in Xenopus laevis oocytes and in the CCD and that synaptobrevin 2 reverses the inhibition. These results suggest that a pool of silent K  channels are present in the CCD, which may be activated by synaptobrevin during fusion of transport vesicles to the plasma membranes.; S1 c$ ]8 _  E/ n9 J
. U' S, {8 f- u) o0 B, v: X" ^/ R
MATERIALS AND METHODS

Molecular biology. Wild-type ROMK1 cDNA is in the pSPORT plasmid (12). Oocyte expression constructs (in pGEMME vector) of rat syntaxin 1A, 3, and 4 are gifts from Dr. I. Bezprozvanny (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX). Rat synaptobrevin 2 and synaptotagmin 2 (in pBlueScript) are gifts from Dr. T. Südhof and Dr. M. Cobb (UT Southwestern Medical Center). mCAP cRNAs for ROMK1, synaptotagmin 2, synaptobrevin 2, and syntaxin isoforms were transcribed in vitro (17). For construction of fusion proteins, nucleotide sequences corresponding to the cytoplasmic domains of syntaxin 1A (amino acid 1–265; GST-S1A-C), syntaxin 3 (amino acid 1–263; GST-Syn3-C), and syntaxin 4 (amino acid 1–263; GST-Syn4-C) were amplified by PCR and subcloned into the pGEX-2T bacterial expression vector (Pharmacia). Production and purification of the respective glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins were performed as described (14, 18). Hexahistidine-tagged fusion proteins containing the COOH terminus of ROMK1 (amino acid 181–391; H6-RKC) were produced using the pRSET vector (Invitrogen) as described (18).; A# s* X- H$ C/ j/ o9 c9 ]

Two-electrode voltage-clamp recording. X. laevis oocytes were prepared as previously described (14, 17, 18, 35). Oocytes were injected with cRNA for ROMK1 and/or SNARE proteins as indicated. Current-voltage relationships (–100 to  100 mV, in 25-mV steps) were measured in oocytes at 23°C by two-electrode voltage clamp using an OC-725C oocyte clamp amplifier (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT), pCLAMP7 software, and a Digidata 1200A digitizer (Axon Instrument). The resistance of current and voltage microelectrodes (filled with a 3 M KCl solution) was 1–2 M. The bath solution contained (in mM) 96 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, and 5 HEPES (pH 7.5 by KOH).
% I! G+ |. U" p. \+ T
Single-channel patch-clamp recording. Patch-clamp pipettes (pulled from borosilicate glass, Warner Instruments) were filled with solutions containing (in mM) 100 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, and 5 HEPES (pH 7.4 with KOH). Pipette tip resistance ranged from 3 to 5 M. The Mg2 -free FVPP bath solution [(in mM) 100 KCl, 10 EDTA, 2 fluoride, 1 vanadate, 1 pyrophosphate, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4] has been described previously (14, 17, 18). Single-channel currents were recorded with an Axopatch 200B patch-clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA), low-pass filtered at 1 kHz using an eight-pole Bessel filter, sampled every 0.1 ms (10 kHz) with Digidata-1200A interface, and stored directly onto a computer hard disk (120 GB) using pCLAMP9 software (Axon Instruments). Data were transferred to a CD for long-term storage. For analysis, event list files were generated and analyzed for open probability using pCLAMP9. Open probability was analyzed on segments of continuous recording (at least 2 min). For recording of the K  channels in the CCD, patch-clamp recording was performed in split-open CCD from rats fed a normal-K  diet as described (36).) o! S* l$ I- b% P# }: K
" D- q' [1 O4 A- Y
Biochemical interactions of ROMK with syntaxin isoforms. Fusion proteins GST-S1A-C, GST-Syn3-C, and GST-Syn4 S1A-C were incubated with purified H6-RKC and precipitated using glutathione Sepharose-4B beads (14, 18). The precipitates were separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, analyzed by immunoblot analysis using polyclonal antibodies against the COOH terminus of ROMK1 (1:1,000 dilution) (14) followed by horseradish peroxidase-coupled donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:5,000 dilution), and visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ).
) L9 K4 j' S8 k( M. l  t) H/ W
RESULTS; E* b1 T) [: O+ h. D- O

Inhibition of ROMK by syntaxin 1A and reversal of inhibition by synaptobrevin 2. The regulation of ROMK1 channels by syntaxin 1A was studied in X. laevis oocytes by two-electrode voltage-clamp recording. Coexpression of syntaxin 1A with ROMK1 in oocytes inhibited whole cell ROMK1 currents (Fig. 1A). In contrast, coexpression of neither syntaxin 3 nor syntaxin 4 inhibited ROMK1 currents. Figure 1B shows the characteristic weak inward rectification of the current-voltage relationship of ROMK currents and inhibition of the currents by extracellular barium. The inhibition of ROMK1 currents by syntaxin 1A was dose dependent (Fig. 1C). The concentration of cRNA for syntaxin 1A required for inhibition of ROMK1 (5 and 20 ng for half-maximal and maximal inhibition, respectively) is similar to that for inhibition of voltage-gated Ca2  channels (3, 37).

The v-SNARE synaptobrevin 2 forms a tight complex with syntaxin 1A during fusion of exocytotic vesicles with target membranes (31). We found that coexpression of synaptobrevin 2 prevented syntaxin 1A inhibition of ROMK1 (Fig. 2). By itself, synaptobrevin 2 did not inhibit ROMK1 currents. Synaptotagmin 2, another v-SNARE not involved in the formation of core complex with syntaxin 1A (31), did not affect syntaxin 1A-mediated inhibition of ROMK1 currents. Nor did synaptotagmin 2 by itself inhibit ROMK1 currents.

Syntaxin 1A regulates ROMK1 in the plasma membrane. The domain structure of syntaxin 1A can be separated into a NH2-terminal cytoplasmic domain (amino aicds 1–265) and COOH-terminal transmembrane domain (amino acids 266–288) (8). Syntaxin 1A regulates the voltage-dependent Ca2  channels, CFTR, and ENaC via direct interactions with channel proteins (3, 16, 22–24, 29, 30, 33, 37). Inhibition of Ca2  channels and CFTR by syntaxin 1A involves the NH2-terminal cytoplasmic region. We made GST fusion proteins containing the cytoplasmic region of syntaxin 1A, 3, or 4 and examined direct interaction with ROMK1 using in vitro pull-down assays. GST fusion proteins were incubated with purified hexahistidine-tagged fusion proteins containing the COOH-terminal intracellular domain of ROMK1 (H6-RKC) and precipitated by glutathione Sepharose-4B beads. As shown in Fig. 3, the cytoplasmic domain of syntaxin 1A, but not of syntaxin 3 or 4, interacted with the COOH-terminal intracellular domain of ROMK1.% k2 s' e  I: H# S& F) o

To see whether inhibition of ROMK1 currents by syntaxin 1A occurs via direct interaction with channels in the plasma membrane, we examined the effects of syntaxins on ROMK1 in excised inside-out membranes. In inside-out membranes from oocytes expressing ROMK1, application of GST fusion protein of the cytoplasmic region of syntaxin 1A to the cytoplasmic face of the membrane decreased the activity of ROMK1 channel (Fig. 4A). Application of 0.3 and 1 μM syntaxin fusion protein inhibited ROMK1 activity by 51 and 80%, respectively (Fig. 4B). As controls, GST alone (Fig. 4B) and fusion proteins of syntaxin 3 and 4 (not shown) had no effects. Overexpression of syntaxin 1A in oocytes may alter the stoichiometry of v-SNARE vs. t-SNARE proteins and thus decrease ROMK1 currents by preventing delivery of newly synthesized ROMK1 to plasma membranes. Our results, nevertheless, demonstrate that syntaxin 1A can directly regulate ROMK1 in the plasma membrane of oocytes.
; a$ C7 |: A7 g* A3 L) c8 F
Effects of botulinum toxins on K  channel in the CCD. The physiological role of syntaxin 1A in the regulation of K  channels in principal cells of rat CCD was examined using inside-out patch-clamp recording and application of botulinum toxin C1 to the cytoplasmic face of the membrane patches. Botulinum toxin C1 inactivates syntaxin 1A by cleaving at the junction between the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains (21, 31, 32). The direct inhibition of CFTR by syntaxin 1A is reversed by botulinum toxin C1 (23).

After formation of a G seal and initial recording in the cell-attached configuration, inside-out membrane was excised. Inside-out recording is necessary because the entry of toxins across the plasma membrane of nonneuronal cells is limited. As reported by others (26), we found that the incidence of K  channels per patch from animals on a normal-K  diet is 28% [16 of 58 patches contain active channels; average number of channels times open probability (NPo) 0.35 ± 0.05, n = 58]. In the representative experiment shown in Fig. 5A, channel activity was not detected during recording in the cell-attached configuration (not shown) or after excision of inside-out membranes (Fig. 5A). However, the activity of channels was revealed by application of botulinum toxin C1 (1 U/ml) to the cytoplasmic face of the inside-out membrane. In multiple experiments, average activity of the K  channels (measured as NPo) was increased about fourfold by toxin C1 over 4 min (Fig. 5B).

Botulinum toxin B inactivates synaptobrevin but not syntaxin (31). In separate experiments, application of botulinum toxin B to the cytoplasmic face of inside-out membranes did not cause an increase in the activity of K  in the CCD (Fig. 6), demonstrating the specificity of toxin C1. Furthermore, these results agree with the finding that synaptobrevin 2 has no direct inhibitory effect on ROMK. Insertion of channels is unlikely in excised inside-out membranes. These results thus suggest that a pool of K  channels in the apical membrane of CCD is tonically inhibited by membrane-anchored syntaxin 1A. Botulinum toxin C1 cleaves syntaxin 1A at the junction between the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains (21, 31, 32). The cytoplasmic domain of syntaxin 1A causes inhibition of ROMK1 (see Fig. 4 above). However, the concentration of the cytoplasmic domain of syntaxin 1A released by toxin into the cytoplasmic solution is likely much lower than the level sufficient to cause inhibition of the channel. Inhibition of CFTR involves the cytoplasmic region of syntaxin 1A (23, 24). Similarly, injection of toxin C1 into oocytes releases the inhibition of CFTR by syntaxin 1A (23).

DISCUSSION/ b. E: e3 S9 |/ }
' a5 j1 b$ l$ E; G6 W
Besides its role in vesicle docking and fusion, syntaxin 1A has been shown to directly regulate ion channels, including voltage-gated Ca2  channels, CFTR Cl channels, and ENaC in plasma membranes (3, 22–24, 29, 30, 33, 37). In the present study, we report that syntaxin 1A regulates ROMK in X. laevis oocytes and in the CCD. Initially thought to be exclusively in neuronal tissues, syntaxin 1A was later shown to colocalize with CFTR in colonic and airway epithelial cells (22–24). Probably due to low abundance, localization of syntaxin 1A to apical membranes of renal tubules has not been demonstrated. Nevertheless, syntaxin 1A regulates ENaC in oocytes and in the A6 epithelial cell line (29) and regulates H -ATPase in cultured and native inner medullary collecting duct cells (1). Together, these results suggest that syntaxin 1A has a general role in direct regulation of ion channels in many tissues, including airway and renal epithelia.
. H, C2 v: q0 m" i
The direct regulation of voltage-dependent Ca2  channels by SNARE proteins is important for control of neurotransmitter release in the neuronal synapses (3, 30, 33, 37). In the resting state, Ca2  channels are inhibited by binding to syntaxin 1A. During fusion of vesicles to the target membrane, syntaxin, SNAP-25, and synaptobrevin interact to form a very tight complex, called the core complex (4, 31, 32). The core complex forms the receptor for binding by -SNAP (for soluble NSF attachment protein; different from SNAP-25), which in turn recruits the ATPase NEM-sensitive fusion protein (NSF). ATP hydrolysis by NSF dissociates the SNAREs, permitting subsequent fusion to occur. Formation of the core complex from docking of vesicles to the presynaptic surface membrane activates Ca2  channels and raises local Ca2  concentration to facilitate fusion of vesicles.

What is the potential physiological role of the direct regulation of ROMK by syntaxin 1A AVP increases K  secretion in the CCD (5, 9). The increase in K  secretion by AVP is also associated with an increase in the number of active K  channels, as measured in cell-attached patch-clamp recording (5). The mechanism for the increase in active channels is not known. Botulinum toxin C1 inactivates syntaxin 1A specifically (31). We find that botulinum toxin C1 increases activity (measured as NPo) of ROMK by about fourfold in inside-out membranes where insertion of channels is unlikely. Single-channel open probability of ROMK is 0.9 at intracellular pH 7.4 (6, 17), suggesting that the increase in NPo by toxin C1 is due to an increase in the number of active channels. Thus some of the K  channels in the apical membrane of principal cells are inactive (i.e., silent channels) because of binding to syntaxin 1A. AVP increases water permeability in the kidney collecting duct by promoting plasma membrane insertion of the water channel aquaporin 2 (34). The increase in water permeability by AVP parallels with the increase in K  channel density. Synaptobrevin 2 is present in aquaporin 2-containing vesicles (25). We find that synaptobrevin 2 releases syntaxin 1A-induced inhibition of the channels (Fig. 2). Thus reversal of syntaxin 1A-induced inhibition of K  channels by synaptobrevin 2 may account for the increase in the density of active channels by AVP.
' M0 A+ f+ [& p0 J' x/ k# D
Syntaxin 3 and 4 are expressed in renal collecting ducts (19, 20). Syntaxin 4 is localized to the apical membrane of collecting ducts and proposed to be involved in fusion of aquaporin 2-containing vesicles to the apical membrane (19). Interestingly, we find that neither syntaxin 3 nor syntaxin 4 regulates ROMK. We have no obvious explanation for this apparent difference at the moment.4 t" u; J0 @/ b% `5 B
7 V4 g/ R, G; j
ROMK channels are critical for K  secretion in the CCD and Na  reabsorption through the Na-K-2Cl cotransporter in the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop. Multiple factors regulate ROMK channels (9, 11, 13). Some of these factors (besides AVP-induced vesicle fusion) may also modulate syntaxin 1A inhibition of ROMK. For example, phosphorylation of ROMK by protein kinases may alter syntaxin 1A inhibition of ROMK. Future studies will investigate this possibility. Finally, AVP also stimulates Na  reabsorption in the CCD (10). It would be interesting to investigate whether synaptobrevin modulates inhibition of ENaC by syntaxin 1A and, if so, whether it underlies the increase in Na  transport by AVP.
& C' Q0 i' T) [, c7 o* ~
GRANTS

This study is supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants (DK-54368, DK-59530 to C.-L. Huang) and an Established Investigator Award from American Heart Association (0440019N).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Wei Ding for technical assistance and Dr. Byung-Hoon Lee for creation of the pBlueScript-synaptotagmin 2 construct.

FOOTNOTES
% j1 h# P5 e( ~4 a8 y+ r1 e
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
$ T. c6 {8 X5 T8 o" F9 @
REFERENCES5 ]1 l' U5 g) \  @5 j' a) x
$ A6 C1 l* x, Z; h5 p5 N
Alexander EA, Shih T, and Schwartz JH. H  secretion is inhibited by clostridial toxins in an inner medullary collecting duct cell line. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 273: F1054–F1057, 1997.0 ]+ q% z9 b0 R0 b- ^% j, p. O( l
. ^  [2 |& U& Y' m' r2 p7 G
Bennett MK, Garcia-Arraras JE, Elferink LA, Peterson K, Fleming AM, Hazuka CD, and Scheller RH. The syntaxin family of vesicular transport receptors. Cell 74: 867–873, 1993.: w& D0 c; z9 w: I, l0 U7 P

Bezprozvanny I, Scheller RH, and Tsien R. Functional impact of syntaxin on gating of N-type and Q-type calcium channels. Nature 378: 623–626, 1995.
8 I1 a% z. Z" D6 ^; ^8 O
Bock JB and Scheller RH. A fusion of new ideas. Nature 387: 133–135, 1996.

Cassola AC, Giebisch G, and Wang W. Vasopressin increases density of apical low-conductance K  channels in rat CCD. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 264: F502–F509, 1993.

Choe H, Zhou H, Palmer LG, and Sackin H. A conserved cytoplasmic region of ROMK modulates pH sensitivity, conductance, and gating. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 273: F516–F529, 1997.
- E" K! n- N9 M5 @5 L
Dascher C, Matteson J, and Balch WE. Syntaxin 5 regulates endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport. J Biol Chem 269: 29363–29366, 1994.
1 ^# E: }8 G4 a% \% C0 ]" S( d
Fernandez I, Ubach J, Dulubova I, Zhang X, Südhof TC, and Rizo J. Three-dimensional structure of an evolutionarily conserved N-terminal domain of syntaxin 1A. Cell 94: 841–849, 1998.0 Y: r6 x2 h$ j9 H5 T& X; U

Giebisch G. Renal potassium channels: an overview. Kidney Int 48: 1004–1009, 1995.
6 N  Y; M- U- Z' V. N' |
Hawk CT, Li L, and Schafer JA. AVP and aldosterone at physiological concentrations have synergistic effects on Na  transport in rat CCD. Kidney Int Suppl 57: S35–S41, 1996.9 c7 {6 h$ R0 f; u. q9 W

Hebert SC. An ATP-regulated, inwardly rectifying potassium channel from rat kidney (ROMK). Kidney Int 48: 1010–1016, 1995.
- V" Z6 z+ n, T' R  X
Ho K, Nichols CG, Lederer WJ, Lytton J, Vassilev PM, Kanazirska MV, and Hebert SC. Cloning and expression of an inwardly rectifying ATP-regulated potassium channel. Nature 362: 31–38, 1993.

Huang C-L. Regulation of ROMK trafficking and channel activity. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 10: 693–698, 2001.  V: o& e' J+ m( [

Huang C-L, Feng S, and Hilgemann DW. Direct activation of inward rectifier potassium channels and its stabilization by G. Nature 391: 803–806, 1998.6 ]( j/ T( m: w! G
( P& `; w6 o! B8 ?2 N1 Q
Knepper MA and Inoue T. Regulation of aquaporin-2 water channel trafficking by vasopressin. Curr Opin Cell Biol 9: 560–564, 1997.

Lehtonen S, Riento K, Olkkonen VM, and Lehtonen E. Syntaxin-3 and munc-18–2 in epithelial cells during kidney development. Kidney Int 56: 815–826, 1999.0 e4 V9 E; M6 q& Z
* s: n4 |5 v% W3 p! Z* T, a
Leung Y-M, Zeng W-Z, Liou H-H, Solaro CR, and Huang C-L. Ptdlns(4,5)P2 and intracellular pH regulate ROMK1 potassium channel via separate but interrelated mechanisms. J Biol Chem 276: 10181–10189, 2000.
- x/ N" m/ }- D" Z1 E
Liou HH, Zhou SS, and Huang CL. Regulation of ROMK1 channel by protein kinase A via a phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-dependent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 5820–5825, 1999.% ?! b; y, q. \, A- i
$ m4 {' I5 O9 ^0 j
Mandon B, Chou CL, Nielsen S, and Knepper MA. Syntaxin-4 is localized to the apical plasma membrane of rat renal collecting duct cells: possible role in aquaporin-2 trafficking. J Clin Invest 98: 906–913, 1996./ I2 `2 q4 D( B8 P& m% w
0 X* B" {! l  v9 d
Mandon B, Nielsen S, Kishore BA, and Knepper MA. Expression of syntaxins in rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 273: F718–F730, 1997.

Montecucco C and Schiavo G. Mechanism of action of tetanus and botulinum toxins. Mol Microbiol 13: 1–8, 1994.9 s* G7 F+ i' v* T- k( Z
* H1 K  o8 W% O% v6 M  V
Naren AP, Di A, Cormet-Boyaka E, Boyaka PN, McGhee JR, Zhou W, Akagawa K, Fujiwara T, Thome U, Engelhardt JF, Nelson DJ, and Kirk KL. Syntaxin 1A is expressed in airway epithelial cells, where it modulates CFTR Cl– currents. J Clin Invest 105: 377–386, 2000.; r/ |/ G0 \, n/ S
' d- f9 J% ]. A4 {
Naren AP, Nelson DJ, Xie W, Jovov B, Persner J, Bennett MK, Benos DJ, Quick MW, and Kirk KL. Regulation of CFTR chloride channels by syntaxin and munc 18 isoforms. Nature 390: 303–305, 1997.
+ p6 c( n: I7 E6 ?6 u% D7 f4 P
Naren AP, Quick MW, Collawn JF, Nelson DJ, and Kirk KL. Syntaxin 1A inhibits CFTR chloride channels by means of domain-specific protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 10972–10977, 1998.
1 {! y$ C& e; B( L# f0 C0 E' q/ ^
Nielsen S, Marples D, Mohtashami M, Dalby NO, Trimble W, and Knepper MA. Expression of VAMP2-like protein in kidney collecting duct intracellular vesicles: co-localization with aquaporin-2 water channels. J Clin Invest 96: 1834–1844, 1995.' J3 l* ]$ Y! P* J3 u4 _5 B/ _

Palmer LG, Antonian L, and Frindt G. Regulation of apical K and Na channels and Na/K pumps in rat cortical collecting tubule by dietary K. J Gen Physiol 104: 693–710, 1994.

Palmer LG and Frindt G. Regulation of apical K channels in rat cortical collecting tubule during changes in dietary K intake. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 277: F805–F812, 1999.
$ b) ?2 d( e) q% X
Prekeris R, Yang B, Oorschot V, Klumperman J, and Scheller RH. Differential roles of syntaxin 7 and syntaxin 8 in endosomal trafficking. Mol Biol Cell 10: 3891–3908, 1999.
- [. ^5 m' Y3 P! f& K  h
Qi J, Peters KW, Liu C, Wang JK, Edinger RS, Johnson JP, Watkins SC, and Frizzell RA. Regulation of the amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel by syntaxin 1A. J Biol Chem 274: 30345–30348, 1999.2 h2 c  V) L: i- w9 J; A- E4 o+ ~
( F) C& s/ P& X% L' \
Sheng ZH, Rettig J, Takahashi M, and Catterall WA. Identification of a syntaxin-binding site on N-type calcium channels. Neuron 13: 1303–1313, 1994.

Südhof TC. The synaptic vesicle cycle: a cascade of protein-protein interaction. Nature 375: 645–653, 1995.
) }. t# Z/ U& O, a
Sutton RB, Fasshauer D, Jahn R, and Brunger AT. Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4  resolution. Science 395: 347–353, 1998.  H0 D3 c7 X6 t" n8 S

Sutton KG, McRory JE, Guthrie H, Murphy TH, and Snutch TP. P/Q-type calcium channels mediate the activity-dependent feedback of syntaxin-1A. Nature 401: 800–804, 1999.! S8 T; A2 C2 i4 n
  ^/ c! j5 {% a, g+ T) `
Ward DT, Hammond TG, and Harris HW. Modulation of vasopressin-elicited water transport by trafficking of aquaporin 2-containing vesicles. Annu Rev Physiol 61: 683–697, 1999.

Zeng WZ, Babich V, Ortega B, Quigley R, White SJ, Welling PA, and Huang C-L. Evidence for endocytosis of ROMK potassium channel via clathrin-coated vesicles. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 283: F630–F639, 2002.7 X5 Q! E5 ^( d

Zeng WZ, Li XJ, Hilgemann DW, and Huang C-L. Protein kinase C inhibits ROMK1 channel activity via a phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem 278: 16852–16856, 2003.+ T  d' O2 Q" a

Zhong H, Yokoyama CT, Scheuer T, and Catterall WA. Reciprocal regulation of P/Q-type Ca2  channels by SANP-25, syntaxin and synaptotagmin. Nat Neurosci 2: 939–941, 1999.(Tie-Jun Sun, Wei-Zhong Ze)

收藏0 分享0 顶0 踩0