【TPO3】

linxingxing

2 w3 O. U5 ~. e4 o+ A
READING PASSAGE
, m- [: u: ~1 J3 O
* z$ h, E) E$ D+ ?8 Vlisten to the record  \3 c  `+ P5 X& b$ Z
& k& J4 d3 _: \" j6 x+ u' w
. a( d# B- R9 V9 T
参与方式        
: J; {# Z% E* x【批改XXX】xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx5 F- L, W% W1 ~% q% d1 D
【笔记】xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: n0 m0 t, z. ?% z: o4 ?* K【习作】xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

linxingxing

The author of the article and the speaker are talking about whether the painting of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet was a work of Rembrandt. They have different opinions. The writer claims that it won't be Rembrandt work in three aspects-the details of the clothing, the colours, the combined panels, while the lecturer insists that it is Rembrandt work.% y: M  D: ~6 w8 v# B' N: e
1 e8 s# x  o9 g
First, the passage shows that the woman in the painting wearing a white linen cap which indicates that she was a servant while her coat is luxurious fur. Rembrandt was a man who is famous for his carefulness that he could not make such a mistake. Contrary to this statement that the speaker gives evidence based information that the X-ray result provides that the fur collar was not the original painting. It was painted on the painting which had already existed for hundred years. It must be someone who wanted to create over the original one. Therefore, the passage is not right on this aspect.5 q( F5 f3 J0 X  [! P

; P+ `; H" o/ J3 aSecond, the writer proclaims that Rembrandt would not ignore the light and shadow on the lady's face. However, the lecturer says that the original painting did have real light and shadow on her face. It was the light by the later creator that illuminates her face. Hence the writer fails to prove the idea, too.
9 v0 M0 y- }, ?+ m3 f( a  v# E# ?. u& D/ G! }3 q2 X; W
Third, the article persists that the panel was combined by several pieces which had never happened in Rembrandt's works before. On the contrary, the speaker offers that Rembrandt enlarge the panel which was several times than his other works to make it more grand and more valuable. And there is evidence based information that proves that the pieces of the wood of this art-word were from the same tree of his another work. Thereby the assumption of the article is not right in this perspective.
1 ]# I7 C  Q9 v3 o! O. P0 J7 ^/ n9 a7 u
All in all, all the assumption of the writer are far away from convincing after the analysis of the speaker.